Reviving Ophelia - 1717 Words

The book, Reviving Ophelia, is about the hardships girls go through when they are growing up and trudging through puberty. As the author Mary Pipher states it, adolescent girls tend to lose their â€Å"true selves† in order to fit in and comply with the standards that society sets for women. Pipher, a practicing therapist, uses her own case studies to show how pressures put on girls forces them to react in often damaging ways. In most case studies she tells the audience how she helped these girls heal and regain control of their lives. It seems that her primary goal is to warn people of what certain effects can have on girls and what not to do. The one thing that Pipher tends to overlook is what parents can do right to raise healthy†¦show more content†¦Another way that girls chose to deal with their problems is to block it out with the use of drugs and/or alcohol. Pipher explains, â€Å"Often heavy chemical abuse is a red flag that points to other issues such as despair, social anxiety, problems with friends or family, pressure to achieve, negative sexual experiences, or difficulty finding a positive identity† (191). I think that if society didn’t demand so much of girls they would be much better off. The main goal is to gain popularity when that shouldn’t be the case. Girls should want to follow their hearts and do the things that they want to do rather than being pressured into doing what everyone else wants to do. Some girls are worse off than other though. The ones that do better at keeping their â€Å"true selves† are the ones who have had more supportive parents. After reading this book, I decided that the best parents were the ones that loved their children at all times. They are the parents that allow their children to make decisions for themselves, but are always there to intervene and point down the right path. The best parents will keep their children active and still respect their decisions; as Pipher says, â€Å"Both families were reasonably protective and yet allowed the daughters freedom to grow in their own direction† (99). â€Å"Teenagers need parents who will talk to them, supervise them, help them stay organized, and support them when they are down† (134). To me that isShow MoreRelatedReviving Ophelia Essay914 Words   |  4 Pages Reviving Ophelia nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Mary Pipher, author of the book Reviving Ophelia, has made many observations concerning young adolescent girls in our society. She wrote this book in 1994, roughly eleven years ago. Although some of her observations made in the past are not still accurate in today’s world, there are many that are still present in 2005. The primary focus of Pipher’s comments is to explain how young girls are no longer being protected within our society. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ThisRead More Reviving Ophelia Essay example1902 Words   |  8 PagesReviving Ophelia Adolescent girls growing up in today’s society endure many more hardships than in previous years. Adolescence is no longer a time of endless sunny days spent on the back porch with a glass of country time lemonade and a smile extending ear to ear. Adolescence for girls is now generalized as a dark and depressing period of life that often seems hopeless and never ending. Mary Pipher PH.D tries to illustrate just how drastically life has changed over the years for teenage girlsRead MoreThe Growth And Development Of Adolescence : Reviving Ophelia Essay1595 Words   |  7 Pagesrequired to read three books regarding the growth and development of adolescence; Reviving Ophelia by Mary Pipher, Ph.D., Boys Adrift by Leonard Sax, M.D., Ph.D., and The Teenage Brain by Frances E. Jensen, M.D. with Amy Ellis Nutt. Each book was for a different audience because they’re all discussing different topics but they all discuss the growth and development of adolescences in our society . Reviving Ophelia discusses the different types of scenarios Dr. Pipher faced in her practice with teenageRead MoreEssay on Book Report on Reviving Ophelia by Dr. Pipher1488 Words   |  6 PagesReviving Ophelia Dr. Pipher remembers her cousin Polly as a young girl. She describes her as energy in motion. A tomboy, Polly dances, plays sports with the neighborhood boys, and rides horses. Once Polly enters adolescence, however, other children begin teasing her about her tomboyish ways and insist that she be more ladylike. The boys exclude her from their activities, and the girls isolate her because she is different. Polly becomes confused and withdrawn. Later, Polly begins wearingRead MoreReviving Opheli Saving The Selves Of Adolescent Girls1360 Words   |  6 PagesReviving Ophelia: Saving the Selves of Adolescent Girls, is author, Mary Pipher’s attempt to understand her experiences in therapy with adolescent girls (Pipher, p. 11). In the text adolescence is described as a border between childhood and adulthood (Pipher, p. 292). In her quest to understand adolescent girls, Pipher attempts to answer these questions: Why are so many girls in therapy in the 1990s? Why are there more self-mutilators? What is the meaning of lip, nose and eyebrow piercings? HowRead MoreHow Gender Role Socialization Effects Girls More Specifically, Depending On The Teenage Girls Developmental Level1280 Words   |  6 Pagesdecisions concerning how they will act, with who they will associate with, and what life decisions they will choose. Ultimately, the progression by which they determine their identity must inevitability be one of trial an d error. In the book Reviving Ophelia, clinical psychologist Dr. Mary Pipher discusses the social and cultural pressures faced by today s adolescent girls based on her individual clients’ stories. This paper will examine how gender role socialization effects girls more specificallyRead MoreThe Portrayal of Ophelia on Stage Over the Years959 Words   |  4 Pages------------------------------------------------- Portrayal Mary Catherine Bolton (afterwards Lady Thurlow) (1790-1830) as Ophelia in 1813, opposite  John Philip Kembles Hamlet While it is known that  Richard Burbage  played Hamlet in Shakespeares time, there is no evidence of who played Ophelia; since there were no professional actresses on the public stage in  Elizabethan England, we may be certain that she was played by a boy.[11] The  early modern  stage in England had an established set of  emblematic  conventions  forRead MoreReviving Opheli Saving The Selves Of Adolescent Girls881 Words   |  4 PagesWhile reading Mary Pipher’s, â€Å"Reviving Ophelia: Saving the Selves of Adolescent Girls† and Dan Kindlon and Michael Thompson’s, â€Å"Raising Cain: Protecting the Emotional Life of Boys,† I got a better understanding of the mindsets of teenagers in todays society. I learned that countless girls and boys have the same inner battles and do not even realize it. The two songs I chose that best represent ideas of woman and manhood are â€Å"Unpretty,† by TLC and â€Å"Stan,† by Eminem. I believe these songs support manyRead MoreEssay on Women Dont Exist in Their Own Right in the Play1641 Words   |  7 Pageswhat exactly do we mean? In my opinion the way the female characters, Ophelia and Gertrude, in `Hamlet exist, is the way in which they live, the way t hey are viewed by others in the play, and the way would be perceived by us, or the Elizabethan audience. We have to see exactly who the male characters are, and the different parts they play. In addition, this essay will attempt to discover exactly how Shakespeare used Ophelia and Gertrude for the plot, and consider if they exist in their own rightRead More Hamlet - Shakespeares Ophelia as Modern Icon Essay3388 Words   |  14 PagesShakespeares Ophelia as Modern Icon Shakespeares Ophelia is not lacking in attention. As one of Shakespeares most popular female characters she has enjoyed many appellations from the bard. Fair Ophelia. Most beautified Ophelia. Pretty Ophelia. Sweet Ophelia. Dear Ophelia. Beautiful Ophelia†¦sweet maid†¦poor wretch. Poor Ophelia. (Vest 1) All of these names for Ophelia can be found in Shakespeares The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. Since Shakespeares incarnation of Ophelia many

How Literature Impacts Society Essay - 647 Words

How Literature Impacts Society Literature has been crucial to communities since language was tailored and used by people as a form of communication. Literature takes the reader out of their world and brings them into the author’s world. It makes people think outside their normal box if you will. Literature can bring people of different backgrounds, cultures, and ways life together. When people relate through a piece of literature, it really makes you think that you’re not alone and that someone else has been through what you are going through. The way authors are able to grab you with how the characters are feeling or what they are looking at brings the reader into that story. If you read a piece of literature that contains information†¦show more content†¦But in the story most memorable part is the fact that this man before he changed into a huge insect was such a good person. He cared for his family and had such an enormous heart for them. He worked hard every day so that his family could have a better life. He paid off his parent’s debt and the irony of the story is when he turned into an insect his family disowned him. They mistreated him and all they care about was how the bills were going to get paid. Even though this piece of literature is very dream like the main idea of this man being a workhorse for his family and finally when he needed them the most they disowned him. Readers of all societies can relate to how the main character felt. It’s very difficult as a person to understand how other people live their lives or why they do the things they do. Through literature authors make that possible for a reader to truly experience what another person is feeling and thinking. We as readers can travel back in time to see how societies were or we can travel around the world to see how people live in different parts of the world without leaving the comfort of our own homes through literature. Through literature we are able to gain knowledge and use it to better our own society. References DiYanni, R (2007) Literature: Reading Fiction, Poetry, and Drama (6th ed.) New York:Show MoreRelated** Due Saturday. Upload By Noon If Finished Them.. Maya1645 Words   |  7 PagesIntroduction: What is the relationship between how a public health issue is framed and how efficiently a Multinational Corporation can be held accountable? Using the case studies of the Tobacco Industry and the case specific Fossil Fuel Industry, ExxonMobil, I intend to research the impacts of the impact framing an issue framed has on the effectiveness of holding an industry accountable for their violations. To determine how the issue was framed in the eyes of society, I will try to establish the various actorsRead MoreCan Literature Spark Cultural Difference?1185 Words   |  5 Pages Can literature spark cultural difference? â€Å"A Little child with such a big heart that will be broken en crumbled everything falls apart†. A literature poem that is beautifuly and creatvly assembled using words. This poem has a deap meaning about out society and how we indivaduals are so influnced by it. Eventually, society corruptes our purity and made us crumble until everything falled apart. In this world, literature is used and seen in many different forms, and through this forms we see profoundRead MoreA Dystopian Society Is An Imbalance Between The Government And The People Essay1372 Words   |  6 PagesLuigi Zavala Ms. Underhill 6 HELA 21 November 2016 Thesis Statement: A dystopian society is an imbalance between the government and the people and how their choices affect the society in a bad way; Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany is a very good example of a dystopian society. By analyzing Nazi Germany and Hitler’s tyranny, one can notice Adolf’s changes in Germany, his impacts on people, and how the genres of literature can be taught through dystopia. Outline Introductory Paragraph with thesis ChangesRead MoreEffects Of Social Class On British Literature1113 Words   |  5 Pagesconflicts in British/World Literature made a significant impact throughout the history of literature. The effects of social conflict throughout literature dictates the lives and how they shape literature within novels and throughout the world. Social class in British Literature had a tremendous presence and the force of class difference in literature are self evident. Which leads a reader to ask â€Å" How did social class affect literature?† and â€Å" What was its purpose on literature?† The goal of this paperRead MoreGeoffrey Chaucer s Impact On Literature1231 Words   |  5 PagesGeoffrey Chaucer’s Impact on Literature: English poet Geoffrey Chaucer is acclaimed to be one of the best and most influential poets in history. Geoffrey Chaucer wrote several famous literary works in what is called middle English. Geoffrey Chaucer was born in 1340 in London, England. Over the course of Chaucer’s life, he entered and exited several different social classes. He began to write his most known pieces when he became a public servant to Countess Elizabeth of Ulster in 1357. He diedRead MoreThe Impact of Media on LGBTQ1161 Words   |  5 Pagesis an important agent in our society. It shapes ideas and creates movements that cultivate our country. It can do something as little as providing an entertaining element in our lives to something as big as starting a revolution. Throughout history media has played an integral role in the progression in ideas that were considered socially deviant. From war propaganda to abortion, media has provided a method of getting the word out. Media has particularly had a n impact on the LGBTQ community. It hasRead MoreThe Opposition Of Dracula And Its Influences On Vampire Literature1467 Words   |  6 Pagesvampire literature Have you ever thought to yourself, what has influenced vampire literature today? Well, neither have I, but it wouldn’t hurt to touch on the subject. Dracula introduces the idea of lust and death within vampirism. Also, there are many connections that I make throughout this essay between Dracula and I am Legend, proving that Dracula was an influence on the book. The opposition of Dracula has had great influences on vampire literature.We see that these two pieces of literature are soRead MoreSocial Issues In American Literature972 Words   |  4 Pages American Literature from its beginnings is shaped by a demand towards reforming society by bringing awareness towards towards social issues and a need to question societal norms.American literature from its beginnings has focused around establishing the American identity , and has also served as a means to address social issues that have plagues American society. The three authors that are representative of these ideals are t he following; Hector De St John Crevecoeur Benjamin Franklin, andRead MoreVoices Beyond Exploitation : Gender Norms And Racial Bias1657 Words   |  7 Pagesadvocated for equal rights began to write down their personal stories of how slavery and social restrictions have impacted their lives. At first they would write in small paragraphs and poems, but later they would create collections of slave and feminist literature, that once published reached a range of people across the world. They would often write literature that would express their personal thoughts while exploring the impacts of oppression, restriction of freedom and religious beliefs had. SlaveryRead MoreCriticism In Kate Chopins The Story Of An Hour830 Words   |  4 Pages Upon my first introduction to Creole/ Cajun accented style of literation, it was almost impossible not to notice the influence of nineteenth century Louisiana life style, the climate of the region, and the cultural impact on its’ literature. Without any introduction to any other writer with this kind of writing style to verify my assertion of Kate Chopin’s work, nonetheless Chopin does a brilliant job of exhibiting her Creole background in her work coherently. Although many may argue that modern

Critical lens essay Free Essays

Critical Lens Essay Free Essays â€Å"All literature shows us the power of emotion. It is emotion, not reason, that motivates characters in literature,† as said by Duff Brenna. This quote means that characters act on their emotions rather than on logic. We will write a custom essay sample on Critical Lens Essay or any similar topic only for you Order Now They do not think before they act, they just react to the situation. This quote is true based on many pieces of literature. Two pieces in particular that prove this are the play Othello by William Shakespeare and the play Medea by Euripides. In the Shakespeare play Othello, the protagonist is fooled by his best friend, the antagonist Iago, into thinking that his wife, Desdemona, is cheating on him. Iago tricks Othello into thinking she is unfaithful. Othello then decides that the only way he can deal with her unfaithfulness is by killing her. Rather than questioning whether or not Desdemona did cheat on him, Othello acts on his emotion. He does not think his plan through; each conflict that he deals with is handled through his blinded emotion rather than his logic and reasoning. In the tragic end, Othello realizes that everything was a lie and he was tricked by Iago. In his last action based on his emotions, he killed himself. The play, Medea by Euripides deals with the same type of protagonist. Medea, the great sorceress was betrayed by her husband, Jason. He promised her a happy life in his home country, but later leaves her for a new woman. He tells her that he is marrying the princess to secure his family line, but it is a lie. Medea is so hurt by his betrayal that not only does she kill his bride to be, but she also murders her children. Both decisions were made out of emotion; she was jealous of the princess and she didn’t want her sons to deal with her shame. She did not think clearly about either murder, she acted based on her emotions at the time. Tragically, again, people died because the protagonist did not think their plans through. Both plays deal with characters acting through their emotions. If Medea or Othello had taken the time to think about their actions, then each play would not have ended so tragically. Othello kills himself because of what he had done and Medea flees the country, alone, because she fears her life is in danger. This illustrates that characters who act through their emotions are later punished in one way or another. â€Å"All literature shows us the power of emotion. It is emotion, not reason, that motivates characters in literature. † Duff Brenna is stating that all characters tend to act without thinking. By doing so, often times they regret what they have done and makes them act out again. In the case of Medea and Othello, both characters committed murder based on an emotion and later on regretted it. How to cite Critical Lens Essay, Essay examples

Compare And Contrast The Treatment Of Rhetoric †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Compare And Contrast The Treatment Of Rhetoric In The Political Thought Of Plato And Aristotle. Which View Do You Find More Compelling? Answer: Introduction The rhetoric can be defined as the art discourse, in which the writer tends to persuade or inform a particular section of population or the audience (Jewel, 2016). Aristotle has given the best definition of rhetoric whichopines that rhetoric can be defined as the combination of both politics and logic. The rhetoric is considered as one of the most important works on persuasion. As compared to Aristotle, the theories of Plato mention that the subsequent theories of rhetoric are considered as response to the original theory being created by Aristotle (Goulimari, 2014). This can be attributed to the disciplinary divisions, which can be dated back to Peter Ramus attacks on Aristotle. This essay would analyze the different perspectives of both Aristotle and Plato. It would also argue on the views, which becomes more appealing. Discussion Platos opinion regarding the rhetoriccant be considered as high opinion since in the Gorgias, the concept of rhetoric was compared to that of sham which misguided men to counsel with underlying principles (Cope, 2015). He argued that the rhetoric has the power to stand up against everyone else and it can win over vast multitudes of everything. He also supports the fact that if a man, after learning rhetoric, misuses his power, then it is not justifiable to ban and detest his teacher (Cope, 2015). This is because of the fact the teacher cannot be blamed for his teachings. He may have imparted instructions that were to be used in the right context, but the pupil may have made wrong use of the same. Plato concluded that it is correct to detest the concerned misuser, kill him and instead spare his teacher (Cornford, 2014). The primary function of the rhetoric is to lead the souls and master this art form (Dominik, 2014). Plato engaged in the idea of exploring the nature of soul, on which rhetoric was to be used. He pondered upon the idea whether the soul was uniform, one or there are several kinds of the soul (Cope, 2015). If there is existence of different kinds of souls, then Plato also pondered that whether the power of acting belonged to each individual soul or the overall ones (Kastely, 2015). Plato found that the implications of this technique is interesting. One leader who is aware of the human nature should possess a diabolical power or divine power so that he can use the human beings in a way he wishes to (Cope, 2015). In this situation, Plato has made a distinction between non-philosophical and philosophical uses of this art (Hegel, 2015). He opined the fact that a genuine rhetorician should be aware of the truth of the matters for the reason he is engaging in pursuing his people (Morrow, 195 3, pp. 241). A man should know the difference between two fundamental units so that he can actually persuade the people in a better way. As compared to the views of Plato, rhetoric view of Aristotle usually focuses on the aspects of pathos and ethos. Both these concepts have been known to affect judgment (FurleyNehamas, 2015). The ethos and pathos are known to affect the audience when it is important for the speaker to engage in persuasion with the audience. A third type of appeal was also pointed by Aristotle that is concerned with the logos, which the writer or the speaker should use a tool for persuasion (Hegel, 2015). Aristotle argued that the ethos is portrayed during the act of persuasion and it is concerned with the characteristics of the speaker. There are three basic pre-requisites which are needed to appear credible (Hegel, 2015).They are competence, empathy and good intention (Yack, 2006, pp. 421). The speakers ethos is usually transmitted through the modes of self-portrayal, which is influenced further by paraverbal and non-verbal factors (Gallez Reynders, 2015). There is no general good or general bad whi ch is relevant in impressionmanagement and self-portrayal. Each action should always be interpreted in the proper context of the situation or the speech (Hegel, 2015). On the other hand, pathos discloses the emotional influence of the speaker on the audience. The primary objective of the pathos is to minimize the ability of the person to judge. There is one possibility of using by the method of figure of speech (Gallez Reynders, 2015). The figures should be used to use specific content as well as arguments in background or foreground. Aristotle also focused on the idea of logos, which is an appeal towards the logical reasoning (Hegel, 2015). This enables the speakers to demonstrate the argument which appears sound to the audience. For the purpose of argumentation of the arguments, the various kinds of proofs as well as reasoning are of primary concern. The proofs can comprise of both natural as well as artificial proofs (Gallez Reynders, 2015). The natural proofs are the ones in wh ich different kinds of data such as testimonies and documents are being given. On the other hand, the technical proofs are the ones which comprise of a combination of information as well as the art of logic. He observed that the tools of rhetoric were being used to manipulate the emotion of others by the omission of several facts (Gallez Reynders, 2015). He opined that logic is often closely related with reasoning so that a level of scientific certainty can be reached. Rhetoric was often compared with persuading the general audience by the use of probable knowledge so that the practical issues can be resolved. The works of Aristotle was based on hypothesis, observation and experimentation, while the works of Plato was based on virtue and morality (Baer, 2015). The works of Plato had lengthy discussions on various matters of courage, wisdom and justice. He also discusses the role of morality and ethics in philosophy and how the concept of rhetoric was formulated. The views of Aristotle arehighly critical regarding the ideal constitution which is being set by Plato Republic and on the grounds of political unity. It also overvalued political unity and it embraces communism system in which there is inimical to the human nature. I find that the views of Aristotle were more compelling since he believed in the fact that this technique can be used to educate others. On the other hand, Plato believed in the fact that the rhetoric was considered as an evil since it often persuaded others to act in a poor way. Aristotle view was mostly based on the fact that the truth can be reached through the use of intellects with the help of several tools such as affirmative, denial and others (Barnes, 2014). This also forms the crux of Aristotles views which would have a direct influence on the readers or the audience. The views of Aristotleare more ethical and believes in the fact that this can convince others to perform good as the character of the speaker is being taken into account (Gallez Reynders, 2015). He also trusted the good character of the speaker, which would make the readers to believe about the credibility of the content (Chroust, 2015). This was strictly refuted by Plato, who argued that the character of the s peaker could not be trusted and hence rhetoric would be unable to provide any good to the society (Gallez Reynders, 2015). There were significant differences between the ways rhetoric was viewed by both Aristotle and Plato. Aristotle was used to achieve the ideal state with the help of rhetoric and on the other hand, Plato believed in the fact that the rhetoric was unable to achieve the ideal state of convincing the audience. Aristotle believed that universal forms were not always attached to each other while Plato thought that experiments as well as reasoning are sufficient to establish a concept. On the other hand, Aristotle believed that experience and direct observation would be sufficient to establish the quality of an object. Conclusion The link between Aristotle and Plato is obvious and knowledge is considered as virtue. The knowing of the right thing would lead to automatic performance of the right thing. The act of rhetoric was used to influence or manipulate others by adjusting the factors of omitting facts and the manipulation of various emotions. Plato was involved in the blame as well as arrest of Socrates at the context of sophisticated rhetoric. The primary theory of Aristotle was based on the dialectic and logic factors. The rhetoric was considered as a practical debate for persuading the general audience by using the probable knowledge. This essay discussed several ways means of comparison between the views of Plato and Aristotle. The views of Aristotle were more compelling and this is because of the fact that he viewed rhetoric as an ethical one. References Baer, R. (2015). Ethics, values, virtues, and character strengths in mindfulness-based interventions: a psychological science perspective.Mindfulness,6(4), 956-969. Barnes, J. (Ed.). (2014).Complete Works of Aristotle, Volume 1: The Revised Oxford Translation(Vol. 1). Princeton University Press. Chroust, A. H. (2015).Aristotle: New Light on His Life and On Some of His Lost Works, Volume 2: Observations on Some of Aristotle's Lost Works. Routledge. Cope, P. E. M. (2015).Platos Gorgias. Scholars Choice. Cornford, F. M. (2014).Plato's cosmology: the Timaeus of Plato. Routledge. Dominik, W. J. (2014). Roman Poetry and Rhetoric: A Reminder of the Affinity between the two Arts.Akroterion,37(2). Furley, D. J., Nehamas, A. (Eds.). (2015).Aristotle's" Rhetoric": Philosophical Essays. Princeton University Press. Gallez, E., Reynders, A. (2015). Court interpreting and classical rhetoric: Ethos in interpreter-mediated monological discourse.Interpreting,17(1), 64-90. Goulimari, P. (2014).Literary Criticism and Theory: From Plato to Postcolonialism. Routledge. Hegel, G. W. F. (2015).The philosophy of right. Hackett Publishing. Jewel, L. A. (2016). Old-School Rhetoric and New-School Cognitive Science: The Enduring Power of Logocentric Categories. Kastely, J. L. (2015).The Rhetoric of Plato's Republic: Democracy and the Philosophical Problem of Persuasion. University of Chicago Press. Morrow, G. R. (1953). Plato's conception of persuasion.The Philosophical Review and management,62(2), 234-250. Yack, B. (2006). Rhetoric and public reasoning: An Aristotelian understanding of political deliberation.Political Theory,34(4), 417-438. Depew, D. J. (1996). Aristotle's" Rhetoric": An Art of Character.Journal of the History of Philosophy,34(3), 454-456. Minogue, K. (2006). Rationalism revisited.Society,43(2), 81-87. Quimby, R. W. (1974). The growth of Plato's perception of rhetoric.Philosophy Rhetoric, 71-79.